Post by account_disabled on Jan 28, 2024 7:31:56 GMT
That period a very big crisis of politics begins, in its abilities to respond to inequality in these conditions. Chile at the crossroads after the rejection of the new Constitution A year and a little after the current government, in his book he is very critical of it and, especially of the failed constitutional project, defeated in the plebiscite a year ago. How do you see President Boric? It is data, it is not just a value judgment. Two things happened in the first year of government. One, their defeat in the plebiscite, which was a rejection of what they risked with everything and was a categorical defeat. A defeat that was more important when the people in the initial plebiscite voted almost 80% for wanting a new Constitution. But the one that the government wanted to approve was rejected by 62% of the people.
The change that occurred among citizens was brutal. The natural thing is that it would have been approved. The plebiscite was in September and if you asked me in February or March I thought they were doing very badly, but Phone Number Database I believed I was going to win the Approve. The second thing that occurred with a speed that we had not experienced since the 90s is the speed with which the government lost social support. It went from 50-something percent to 28-30. In other words, it is a more minority government than Allende's. And this has to do with the fact that they had things they didn't like, but they didn't have anything to replace them with. And when they began to govern, they began to get trapped in each of the things that they proposed.
They didn't like the AFP [Private Pension Funds], but when you ask them how they are going to change that, we have been arguing for two years and the policy that is going to come out is in no way what they have proposed, because they do not have a majority. For that. They lost their majorities at the level of society and at the level of parliament. If we talk about health, they may not like Isapres [private health insurance], for example, but nobody knows very well what they like and at least what I have seen is that they are divided among themselves on what what do you want to do. In pensions they do not have an answer, in health they do not have an answer, in education the situation is also deteriorating. In public security and terrorism, the differences between them are also very large.
The change that occurred among citizens was brutal. The natural thing is that it would have been approved. The plebiscite was in September and if you asked me in February or March I thought they were doing very badly, but Phone Number Database I believed I was going to win the Approve. The second thing that occurred with a speed that we had not experienced since the 90s is the speed with which the government lost social support. It went from 50-something percent to 28-30. In other words, it is a more minority government than Allende's. And this has to do with the fact that they had things they didn't like, but they didn't have anything to replace them with. And when they began to govern, they began to get trapped in each of the things that they proposed.
They didn't like the AFP [Private Pension Funds], but when you ask them how they are going to change that, we have been arguing for two years and the policy that is going to come out is in no way what they have proposed, because they do not have a majority. For that. They lost their majorities at the level of society and at the level of parliament. If we talk about health, they may not like Isapres [private health insurance], for example, but nobody knows very well what they like and at least what I have seen is that they are divided among themselves on what what do you want to do. In pensions they do not have an answer, in health they do not have an answer, in education the situation is also deteriorating. In public security and terrorism, the differences between them are also very large.